<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>.:SSLFail:. &#187; netcraft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sslfail.com/tag/netcraft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sslfail.com</link>
	<description>1.2.840.113549.1.1</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 14:50:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Potentially 219K Expired SSL Certs?</title>
		<link>http://www.sslfail.com/2009/02/potentially-219k-expired-ssl-certs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.sslfail.com/2009/02/potentially-219k-expired-ssl-certs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 05:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tyler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SSLFail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netcraft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[royal pingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sslfail.com/?p=265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Royal Pingdom has a post up mention that Netcraft has announced there are now one million sites that are using SSL. That&#8217;s valid certs, trusted by a third party, not expired and where the common name matches the hostname.  That&#8217;s a far cry from the 3293 found in Netcrafts first SSL survey.
Does this survey catch [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://royal.pingdom.com/2009/02/05/are-there-219000-websites-with-expired-ssl-certificates/">Royal Pingdom</a> has a post up mention that Netcraft <a href="http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2009/02/01/one_million_ssl_sites_on_the_web.html">has announced</a> there are now one million sites that are using SSL. That&#8217;s valid certs, trusted by a third party, not expired and where the common name matches the hostname.  That&#8217;s a far cry from the 3293 found in Netcrafts first SSL survey.</p>
<p>Does this survey catch everything? Probably not, but it&#8217;s most likely a good starting point.</p>
<p>Now, how did Royal Pingdom determine that there are potentially 219K in expired certs? They based it on a 2007 survey from Venafi (<a href="http://blog.johnath.com/2007/08/20/ssl-infoporn/">referenced here</a>), that said 18% of Fortune 1000 websites had expired certificates. They applied the percentage to the Netcraft total and, voila&#8230; 219K. They also go on to say that even if you have that it&#8217;s still 100K websites with expired certificates.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be willing to wager a guess that if the number is off it&#8217;s mark, that it&#8217;s probably too low rather than two high. I encounter sites all the time with expired certs. Mind you, since we started SSLFail.com, I&#8217;ve had a harder time finding them.  However, I did happen to stumble across one just the other day and since we don&#8217;t feature screenshots with IE often enough&#8230; here you go.</p>
<div id="attachment_266" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><a href="http://www.sslfail.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/openrce-expiredssl-ie7.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-266" title="openrce-expiredssl-ie7" src="http://www.sslfail.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/openrce-expiredssl-ie7.jpg" alt="OpenRCE.org Expired SSL" width="600" height="399" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">OpenRCE.org Expired SSL</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.sslfail.com/2009/02/potentially-219k-expired-ssl-certs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
