Comments on: Potentially 219K Expired SSL Certs? http://www.sslfail.com/2009/02/potentially-219k-expired-ssl-certs/ 1.2.840.113549.1.1 Thu, 01 Jul 2010 03:13:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Samuel Bronson http://www.sslfail.com/2009/02/potentially-219k-expired-ssl-certs/comment-page-1/#comment-5867 Samuel Bronson Thu, 01 Jul 2010 03:13:58 +0000 http://www.sslfail.com/?p=265#comment-5867 What makes this one especially sad is that it's self-signed, so there's really no reason they couldn't replace it with fresh self-signed certificate... What makes this one especially sad is that it’s self-signed, so there’s really no reason they couldn’t replace it with fresh self-signed certificate…

]]> By: Michael Dickey http://www.sslfail.com/2009/02/potentially-219k-expired-ssl-certs/comment-page-1/#comment-51 Michael Dickey Fri, 06 Feb 2009 22:33:14 +0000 http://www.sslfail.com/?p=265#comment-51 Expired certs make me a sad bear. :( Not because they're expired, but because the browsers make it sound like the cert is broken and their security screwed. Expiration is probably necessary, but damn if it doesn't feel useless and just another way for the CAs to make money. Sad bear! :'( Expired certs make me a sad bear. :( Not because they’re expired, but because the browsers make it sound like the cert is broken and their security screwed. Expiration is probably necessary, but damn if it doesn’t feel useless and just another way for the CAs to make money.

Sad bear! :’(

]]>