Comments on: Wachovia Failing at more than Finance http://www.sslfail.com/2009/01/wachovia-failing-at-more-than-finance/ 1.2.840.113549.1.1 Thu, 01 Jul 2010 03:13:58 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Michael Dickey http://www.sslfail.com/2009/01/wachovia-failing-at-more-than-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-11 Michael Dickey Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:25:19 +0000 http://www.sslfail.com/?p=145#comment-11 Actually, odd, I don't get any indication there really is SSL when I hit https://www.wachovia.com in IE6. So much for teaching users to look for the lock. :) Also, if you follow the login form link to https://onlineservices.wachovia.com/auth/AuthService, you might like their cert details there. Actually, odd, I don’t get any indication there really is SSL when I hit https://www.wachovia.com in IE6. So much for teaching users to look for the lock. :)

Also, if you follow the login form link to https://onlineservices.wachovia.com/auth/AuthService, you might like their cert details there.

]]> By: Michael Dickey http://www.sslfail.com/2009/01/wachovia-failing-at-more-than-finance/comment-page-1/#comment-10 Michael Dickey Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:15:47 +0000 http://www.sslfail.com/?p=145#comment-10 As a side note, this brings up a funny thing. So many companies will spend money on "private registration" for their domains, but if they have SSL, give away that same information in the cert details. Go figure. EV SSL makes that even more of a "problem," since you can't just lie and put some ficticious company. As a side note, this brings up a funny thing. So many companies will spend money on “private registration” for their domains, but if they have SSL, give away that same information in the cert details. Go figure.

EV SSL makes that even more of a “problem,” since you can’t just lie and put some ficticious company.

]]>