<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: webmail.rogers.com SSL Fail Image</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sslfail.com/2009/01/rogers-webmai-ssl-fail-image/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sslfail.com/2009/01/rogers-webmai-ssl-fail-image/</link>
	<description>1.2.840.113549.1.1</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 03:13:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: .:SSLFail:. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rogers Webmail SSLFail Follow-up</title>
		<link>http://www.sslfail.com/2009/01/rogers-webmai-ssl-fail-image/comment-page-1/#comment-3302</link>
		<dc:creator>.:SSLFail:. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Rogers Webmail SSLFail Follow-up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 04:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sslfail.com/?p=109#comment-3302</guid>
		<description>[...] Follow-up   Posted by Tyler on July 21, 2009  SSLFail  A while back we posted a screenshot of the Rogers Webmail SSLFail. I decided to follow-up with Rogers to see if they were going to resolve the issue anytime soon. I [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Follow-up   Posted by Tyler on July 21, 2009  SSLFail  A while back we posted a screenshot of the Rogers Webmail SSLFail. I decided to follow-up with Rogers to see if they were going to resolve the issue anytime soon. I [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smalm</title>
		<link>http://www.sslfail.com/2009/01/rogers-webmai-ssl-fail-image/comment-page-1/#comment-2869</link>
		<dc:creator>smalm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 23:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sslfail.com/?p=109#comment-2869</guid>
		<description>July 3rd and they still haven&#039;t fixed this.  Have you contacted Rogers and if so, was there any response?

This is exactly the kind of thing that trains people to ignore legitimate security warnings.

Shame on Rogers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>July 3rd and they still haven&#8217;t fixed this.  Have you contacted Rogers and if so, was there any response?</p>
<p>This is exactly the kind of thing that trains people to ignore legitimate security warnings.</p>
<p>Shame on Rogers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
